League Discussions

[Lee]

Please feel free to leave a message here or start a new topic regarding our port Elizabeth league.

Thanks

Lee

[charl]

Hi Lee

I see the new scoring system you are trying but honestly you must not try to over complicate the issue.

Look at the new singles scoring for Eldred & Wayne who have won 8 of 11 games played. They are ranked 27th yet Filmar from Legacy 1 has only won 7 games of 12 played but he's ranked 18th. How can he be ranked higher with fewer games won. The fact that he has played 1 more game is irrelevant. Eldred & Wayne should in fact be ranked at number 10, just below Paul who has won 9 games. Eldred & Wayne should not be penalised because they missed 1 game. The person who [b]WINS the most games at the end of the season should be no 1 regardless of how many games he played to achieve this.

The same applies to the doubles. You have a team ranked 20th who have won only 2 games but then there are 21 teams ranked lower than them but who has won more games!

If games played & not games won becomes the crucial criteria you could end up with the winner of the league having won 10/108 (all games played) & 2nd place having won 100/107 (missed one game). That does not make sense.

Thanks
Charl

[Lee]

Hi Charl

As you will see with my new posting on the main page. I have made this a priority of mine and a final decision will be made regarding this issue by early next week.

I want to put this issue to bed and move on. I completely understand the confusion and that is why I want this issue finalised as soon as possible.

Trust me, nobody will be happier than me once this issue is finalised.

Thanks for raising this issue. You weren't the only one, so at least now it is getting the attention it deserves, and a final result will be made available next week as to how the scoring will be done and displayed here for all the players.

Regards

Lee